Mainly for political reasons, to keep the alliance together.
Eisenhower told Churchill that the attack in Europe would take two to three years to prepare, and that it was the only thing that could win the war against Germany. That meant Russia would be facing the entire German military, which Stalin was unwilling and perhaps unable to do. It meant the British people had to put up with more years of privation, casualties and bombings; it meant the U-boat campaign continued; and foreign allies would fall away, and German allies, mainly Italy and France, but also co-belligerents in central and northern Europe and the middle east, would stick with Hitler.
On the US side, people would start asking why we were bogged down in Europe doing nothing when it was Japan that bombed Pearl Harbor. If the US had lost the battle of Midway, for example, a lot of people would have said the US needs its entire military in the Pacific.
Plus people all over the world were saying let the dictators kill each other on the German Eastern front, who cares if continental Europe ends up fascist or communist? Getting US troops engaged in combat would solidify US support.
- ¿Qué hizo que la Wehrmacht fuera la fuerza de combate más efectiva en ese momento?
- ¿Cómo fue el fascismo una causa de la Segunda Guerra Mundial?
- ¿Cómo se vieron afectados los hijos y nietos de los soldados británicos que lucharon en la Segunda Guerra Mundial?
- ¿Cómo debo responder a la afirmación de que “el Reino Unido y Francia causaron el surgimiento de la Alemania nazi, culparlos por la Segunda Guerra Mundial y el Holocausto”?
- ¿Qué guerras que ocurrieron fueron inútiles y terminaron siendo en vano?
Eisenhower opposed the operation at first, but later conceded that the political calculations were probably correct.